Prediction of Nikala Scholtz vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Scholtz vs N. Lammons

Nikala Scholtz

RSA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

595

320

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$4.3K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nathaniel Lammons

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

595

320

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$4.3K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Scholtz 3 - 0 Lammons

They have played 6 sets in total, with Nikala Scholtz winning 6 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 0. The last match between Nikala Scholtz and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Zimbabwe F3 (Harare), 29-06-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Scholtz	3
Lammons	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(QF) Zimbabwe F3 (Harare)(06-29-17)

Stats

Nikala Scholtz

Nathaniel Lammons

(R1) Zimbabwe F2 (Harare)(06-21-17)

Stats

Nikala Scholtz

Nathaniel Lammons

(R2) Zimbabwe F1 (Harare)(06-15-17)

Stats

Nikala Scholtz

Nathaniel Lammons

N. Scholtz vs N. Lammons H2H Profile

N. Scholtz	Stats	N. Lammons
$4,340	Career Prize Money	$0
64.58% (217-119)	Career Total W/L	53.42% (78-68)
3	Hard	0
13	Titles	0
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Scholtz vs N. Lammons Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikala Scholtz has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 65.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikala Scholtz, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nikala Scholtz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathaniel Lammons has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nikala Scholtz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathaniel Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nikala Scholtz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 213/104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/5). Nathaniel Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 50/33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Nikala Scholtz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathaniel Lammons has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Nikala Scholtz winning 3 times and Nathaniel Lammons being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Nikala Scholtz winning 6 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 0.
The last match between Nikala Scholtz and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Zimbabwe F3 (Harare), 29-06-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:40.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikala Scholtz has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathaniel Lammons has played against players with an average rank of 867.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikala Scholtz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikala Scholtz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathaniel Lammons has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nikala Scholtz vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Scholtz vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Scholtz	Stats	N. Lammons
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	0
36	Games Won	17
13	Aces (Total)	11
4	Total Double Faults	13
1:19:40	Average Match Time	1:19:40
69% (110/159)	1st Serve %	56% (97/174)
76% (84/110)	1st Serve Win %	66% (64/97)
57% (28/49)	2nd Serve Win %	39% (30/77)
48% (11/23)	Break Pts Won %	25% (2/8)
46% (80/174)	Return Points Win %	30% (47/159)
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Scholtz Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
South Africa F3 (Stellenbosch) - 03-12-2018
QF Maciej SmolaM. Smola	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R2 Connor FarrenC. Farren	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Patrick FoleyP. Foley	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
South Africa F2 (Stellenbosch) - 26-11-2018
R2 Toby MartinT. Martin	L	6-1 6-7(0) 6-4	Stats
R1 Joshua LuckJ. Luck	W	6-2 7-6(7)	Stats

View All

N. Lammons Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
Q1 Tomohiro MasabayashiT. Masabayashi	L	5-7 7-5 1-2 ret.	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 01-11-2021
Q1 Gijs BrouwerG. Brouwer	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Mats RosenkranzM. Rosenkranz	L	6-4 4-6 7-6(4)	Stats
Szczecin Challenger - 13-09-2021
Q1 Nicola KuhnN. Kuhn	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Nottingham 1 Challenger - 07-06-2021
Q1 Borna GojoB. Gojo	L	7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Scholtz vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Scholtz	Stats	N. Lammons
64.58% (217/119)	YTD Win/Loss	53.42% (78/68)
60.28% (466/307)	Sets Win/Loss	55.46% (188/151)
53.70% (4049/3491)	Games Win/Loss	52.85% (1681/1500)
67.19% (213/104)	Hard Win/Loss	60.24% (50/33)
16.67% (1/5)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (10/12)
23.08% (3/10)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.00% (18/22)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.43	Aces Per Game	0.3
1598	Aces Total	463
0.14	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
512	Total Double Faults	233
1:1:36	Average Match Time	1st Match
613.72	Average Opponent Rank	397.35
65% (8867/13657)	1st Serve %	60% (3350/5549)
75% (6628/8867)	1st Serve Win %	70% (2359/3350)
51% (2445/4791)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1061/2199)
39% (501/1279)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (162/401)
37% (5397/14428)	Return Points Win %	35% (1907/5473)
38.46% (5/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
44.44% (4/5)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
20.00% (5/20)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (13/26)
70.24% (203/86)	Futures W/L	60.75% (65/42)
65% (209/324)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (78/145)
67% (4/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
55% (77/139)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (24/46)
64% (64/100)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (16/46)
92% (191/176)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (83/68)
8% (191/15)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (83/15)
26% (144/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (63/11)